<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Qwicket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Typical maven project -- broken.  One of the draws of Wicket is that it doesn&#039;t itself use maven. 

I know pretty much how to fix these errors, but I already DID for half of them (javamail, ejb3) at least twice, and I am *sick and tired* of continually jumping through the hoops of a mavenized project.


BUILD FAILED
/home/chuck/dl/unpack/qwicket/build.xml:22: Unable to resolve artifact: required artifacts missing:
  javax.persistence:ejb:jar:3.0-public-draft-20060327
  wicket:wicket:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
  org.hibernate:hibernate:jar:3.2.0cr1
  wicket:wicket-extensions:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
  javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.3
  wicket:wicket-spring-annot:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
  wicket:wicket-spring:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical maven project &#8212; broken.  One of the draws of Wicket is that it doesn&#8217;t itself use maven. </p>
<p>I know pretty much how to fix these errors, but I already DID for half of them (javamail, ejb3) at least twice, and I am *sick and tired* of continually jumping through the hoops of a mavenized project.</p>
<p>BUILD FAILED<br />
/home/chuck/dl/unpack/qwicket/build.xml:22: Unable to resolve artifact: required artifacts missing:<br />
  javax.persistence:ejb:jar:3.0-public-draft-20060327<br />
  wicket:wicket:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT<br />
  org.hibernate:hibernate:jar:3.2.0cr1<br />
  wicket:wicket-extensions:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT<br />
  javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.3<br />
  wicket:wicket-spring-annot:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT<br />
  wicket:wicket-spring:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlee</title>
		<link>http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>jlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Supporting both versions could be tricky.  Once we see what migration issues there are with 2.0 perhaps a more intelligent decision can be made in that regard.  If it&#039;s too complicated, though, I don&#039;t have much desire to try to support that.  We&#039;ll have to see though.  Changes like the constructor change are pretty significant.  Here&#039;s the list so far:  http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Migrate-2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supporting both versions could be tricky.  Once we see what migration issues there are with 2.0 perhaps a more intelligent decision can be made in that regard.  If it&#8217;s too complicated, though, I don&#8217;t have much desire to try to support that.  We&#8217;ll have to see though.  Changes like the constructor change are pretty significant.  Here&#8217;s the list so far:  <a href="http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Migrate-2.0" rel="nofollow">http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Migrate-2.0</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Why flip the switch? Even though some people might want to switch to 2.0 once it&#039;s out, I&#039;m sure that a lot of people would rather be able to start a new project using the more stable 1.2 version. I would, instead of a switch, add a drop-down so you could select which version of wicket you want to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why flip the switch? Even though some people might want to switch to 2.0 once it&#8217;s out, I&#8217;m sure that a lot of people would rather be able to start a new project using the more stable 1.2 version. I would, instead of a switch, add a drop-down so you could select which version of wicket you want to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlee</title>
		<link>http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>jlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Correct.  Qwicket will support 2.0 as soon as it&#039;s released but for now practicality says we stick with 1.2.  When 2.0 gets closer, I&#039;ll start integrating it ahead of release so that hopefully as soon as Wicket 2.0 ships, we can flip the switch and start using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.  Qwicket will support 2.0 as soon as it&#8217;s released but for now practicality says we stick with 1.2.  When 2.0 gets closer, I&#8217;ll start integrating it ahead of release so that hopefully as soon as Wicket 2.0 ships, we can flip the switch and start using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eelco</title>
		<link>http://www.antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Eelco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Kudos! Is this for Wicket 1.2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos! Is this for Wicket 1.2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
