Comments on: Denver JUG Recap http://www.antwerkz.com/denver-jug-recap/ Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:18:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: jlee http://www.antwerkz.com/denver-jug-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-15354 jlee Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:38:19 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1013#comment-15354 Sure. I recently reorganized and broke certain links. I'll try to get that back up in the next day or two. After I finish my taxes... Sure. I recently reorganized and broke certain links. I’ll try to get that back up in the next day or two. After I finish my taxes…

]]> By: Jorge Sanguinetti http://www.antwerkz.com/denver-jug-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-15326 Jorge Sanguinetti Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:07:25 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1013#comment-15326 Any possibilities to get the wicket.pdf presentation now? Seems that the link is broken. Best regards. Any possibilities to get the wicket.pdf presentation now? Seems that the link is broken. Best regards.

]]> By: jlee http://www.antwerkz.com/denver-jug-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-135 jlee Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:20:37 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1013#comment-135 In the actual presentation, I talk about how it's possible now under certain conditions but is much easier in 2.0 than it is in the 1.x branch. I'll fix the typo. Thanks for the heads up. In the actual presentation, I talk about how it’s possible now under certain conditions but is much easier in 2.0 than it is in the 1.x branch. I’ll fix the typo. Thanks for the heads up.

]]> By: Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://www.antwerkz.com/denver-jug-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-134 Jean-Baptiste Quenot Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:35:47 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1013#comment-134 In slide #20 there is a small typo: one should read setResponsePage() instead of setReponsePage() of course In slide #20 there is a small typo: one should read setResponsePage() instead of setReponsePage() of course

]]> By: Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://www.antwerkz.com/denver-jug-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-133 Jean-Baptiste Quenot Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:33:37 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1013#comment-133 In slide #48 there is a mention of "Stateless pages" advertised as one of the upcoming attractions, however it is already possible in Wicket 1.2, see for yourself at http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Stateless_pages Unless you are talking of stateless forms... In slide #48 there is a mention of “Stateless pages” advertised as one of the upcoming attractions, however it is already possible in Wicket 1.2, see for yourself at http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Stateless_pages

Unless you are talking of stateless forms…

]]>